IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Swain Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 40 12 25 37 0.925 0.3049 0.2961 0.3147 0.3056
2023-24 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 26 6 16 22 0.846 0.2789 0.2573 0.2879 0.2656
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 — 19 4 7 11 0.579
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 — 26 5 2 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Post
+15.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16724
Forward overall
#837
Forward born in 2003
#1054
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Solat
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikolas Sombrowski
Wentworth · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Forsythe
Wisconsin-Superior · 2008-09
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.