IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Hosszu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 26 18 12 30 1.154 0.1461 0.1461 0.2803 0.2803
2020-21 Northeast Generals NAHL 20 4 2 6 0.300 0.1102 0.1102 0.3167 0.3167
2021-22 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 26 2 2 4 0.154 0.0565 0.0555 0.1623 0.1593
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 20 1 2 3 0.150 0.0551 0.0514 0.1583 0.1476
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC — 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Hamline
+565.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17092
Defenseman overall
#2996
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rob Turville
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gordon Burnett
St. Scholastica · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Filippelli
Wilkes · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.