IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gordon Burnett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-02-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Melville Millionaires SJHL 62 8 16 24 0.387 0.0992 0.0965 0.2913 0.2832
2001-02 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 64 6 13 19 0.297 0.0761 0.0703 0.2234 0.2064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 26 1 6 7 0.269
2004-05 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 25 5 5 10 0.400
2003-04 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 27 2 4 6 0.222
2002-03 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 26 4 9 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2002-03 · St. Scholastica
+555.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16777
Defenseman overall
#917
Defenseman born in 1981
#1409
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Rilei
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.387 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Magill-Diaz
Curry · 2017-18
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Simon Besner
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.