IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Geraci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 40 8 19 27 0.675 0.0503 0.0489 0.1546 0.1504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 19 1 3 4 0.210
2016-17 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 15 1 1 2 0.133
2015-16 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 21 2 1 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2015-16 · Franklin Pierce
+241.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42918
Forward overall
#1836
Forward born in 1995
#408
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Rumolo
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Clay Van Diest
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.310 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Olson
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.