← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Olson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 56 4 9 13 0.232 0.0778 0.0825 0.2148 0.2277
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 56 9 11 20 0.357 0.1312 0.1343 0.3769 0.3858
2018-19 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 25 2 4 6 0.240 0.0925 0.0888 0.3493 0.3354
2019-20 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 18 18 36 0.679 0.2495 0.2495 0.7169 0.7169
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 27 4 9 13 0.481
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 24 8 8 16 0.667
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 26 1 4 5 0.192
2020-21 Stevenson D1 MAC FR 16 4 6 10 0.625
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 16 4 6 10 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2020-21 · Stevenson
+582.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22996
Forward overall
#1142
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2012-13
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.