| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Nipawin Hawks | SJHL | 42 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 0.571 | 0.1464 | 0.1502 | 0.4307 | 0.4418 |
| 2018-19 | Nipawin Hawks | SJHL | 56 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 0.589 | 0.1510 | 0.1471 | 0.4442 | 0.4327 |
| 2019-20 | Nipawin Hawks | SJHL | 49 | 17 | 19 | 36 | 0.735 | 0.1882 | 0.1882 | 0.5538 | 0.5538 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Marian | D3 | NCHA | — | 23 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.652 |
| 2022-23 | Marian | D3 | NCHA | — | 25 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 0.560 |
| 2021-22 | Marian | D3 | NCHA | — | 23 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 0.565 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.