IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Vallescuro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Toronto Patriots OJHL 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0131 0.0137 0.0298 0.0312
2011-12 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 48 10 24 34 0.708 0.2128 0.2135 0.4848 0.4864
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 50 10 25 35 0.700 0.2103 0.2005 0.4791 0.4568
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE JR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE SO 21 2 6 8 0.381
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE FR 25 3 9 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2013-14 · Curry
+172.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33814
Forward overall
#1174
Forward born in 1993
#2333
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Reinholz
Hamline · 2012-13
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrue Trelstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.