| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Grande Prairie Storm | AJHL | 48 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.250 | 0.0838 | 0.0891 | 0.2306 | 0.2453 |
| 2007-08 | — | AJHL | 49 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.143 | 0.0479 | 0.0483 | 0.1318 | 0.1329 |
| 2008-09 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 60 | 11 | 25 | 36 | 0.600 | 0.2012 | 0.1946 | 0.5534 | 0.5352 |
| 2009-10 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 60 | 9 | 42 | 51 | 0.850 | 0.2851 | 0.2611 | 0.7840 | 0.7181 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | SR | 18 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.667 |
| 2012-13 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | JR | 19 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.632 |
| 2011-12 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | SO | 16 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.312 |
| 2010-11 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | FR | 25 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.160 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.