← New Search ↗ Social Card

D'Lane Sather Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-02-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 48 2 10 12 0.250 0.0838 0.0891 0.2306 0.2453
2007-08 AJHL 49 2 5 7 0.143 0.0479 0.0483 0.1318 0.1329
2008-09 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 60 11 25 36 0.600 0.2012 0.1946 0.5534 0.5352
2009-10 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 60 9 42 51 0.850 0.2851 0.2611 0.7840 0.7181
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC SR 18 1 11 12 0.667
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC JR 19 2 10 12 0.632
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC SO 16 0 5 5 0.312
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC FR 25 0 4 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2010-11 · Neumann
-27.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6682
Defenseman overall
#928
Defenseman born in 1989
#843
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.