| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 54 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 0.333 | 0.1966 | 0.2037 | 0.9820 | 1.0177 |
| 2013-14 | — | USHL | 61 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.508 | 0.2998 | 0.2967 | 1.4973 | 1.4817 |
| 2014-15 | Tri-City Storm | USHL | 54 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.259 | 0.1530 | 0.1439 | 0.7639 | 0.7183 |
| 2015-16 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 53 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.358 | 0.2115 | 0.1891 | 1.0562 | 0.9441 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Stout | D1 | BigTen | JR | 27 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.593 |
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | BigTen | JR | 27 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.593 |
| 2017-18 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | BigTen | SO | 23 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.478 |
| 2016-17 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | BigTen | FR | 27 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.481 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.