← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Valesano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 54 4 14 18 0.333 0.1966 0.2037 0.9820 1.0177
2013-14 USHL 61 12 19 31 0.508 0.2998 0.2967 1.4973 1.4817
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 54 4 10 14 0.259 0.1530 0.1439 0.7639 0.7183
2015-16 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 53 7 12 19 0.358 0.2115 0.1891 1.0562 0.9441
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen JR 27 4 12 16 0.593
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 27 4 12 16 0.593
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 23 3 8 11 0.478
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 27 7 6 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Stout
+228.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24888
Forward overall
#957
Forward born in 1995
#2431
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.