← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Star Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 58 19 26 45 0.776 0.2602 0.2648 0.7180 0.7306
2014-15 AJHL 50 10 17 27 0.540 0.1811 0.1747 0.4997 0.4819
2015-16 BCHL 43 12 15 27 0.628 0.2419 0.2232 0.9138 0.8430
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Scholastica D1 MIAC SR 12 3 3 6 0.500
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 12 3 3 6 0.500
2018-19 St. Scholastica D1 MIAC JR 20 6 9 15 0.750
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 20 6 9 15 0.750
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 27 6 17 23 0.852
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 23 3 6 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2016-17 · St. Scholastica
+124.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25244
Forward overall
#974
Forward born in 1995
#1327
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.