IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Star Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 58 19 26 45 0.776 0.2592 0.2637 0.7203 0.7329
2014-15 — AJHL 50 10 17 27 0.540 0.1804 0.1740 0.5013 0.4835
2015-16 — BCHL 43 12 15 27 0.628 0.2444 0.2255 0.9157 0.8448
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 12 3 3 6 0.500
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 20 6 9 15 0.750
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 27 6 17 23 0.852
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 23 3 6 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2016-17 · St. Scholastica
+123.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16954
Forward overall
#641
Forward born in 1995
#1479
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Carpenter
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry McKinney
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.