IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 19 10 21 31 1.632 0.2066 0.2066 — —
2021-22 — USHL 36 0 1 1 0.028 0.0164 0.0170 0.0835 0.0864
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 52 5 21 26 0.500 0.1837 0.1885 0.5278 0.5415
2023-24 Janesville Jets NAHL 55 10 57 67 1.218 0.4476 0.4378 1.2858 1.2577
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Ferris State D1 CCHA — 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2024-25 · Ferris State
-60.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3419
Defenseman overall
#844
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Redick
Plymouth State · 2021-22
1.476 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2003-04
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.