IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reid Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Merritt Centennials BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 27 5 4 9 0.333 0.1001 0.1011 0.2745 0.2773
2015-16 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 20 1 3 4 0.200 0.0601 0.0578 0.1647 0.1583
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 23 4 4 8 0.348
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 18 1 3 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Gustavus Adolphus
+245.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43068
Forward overall
#1856
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Spring
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Johnson
Hamline · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Campbell
Nichols · 2014-15
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.