IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Holman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NOJHL 44 5 11 16 0.364 0.0607 0.0628 0.1514 0.1566
2012-13 Elliot Lake Bobcats NOJHL 44 13 15 28 0.636 0.1063 0.1045 0.2649 0.2604
2013-14 Elliot Lake Bobcats NOJHL 52 8 25 33 0.635 0.1060 0.0992 0.2642 0.2472
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 4 2 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · SUNY Morrisville
+188.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39400
Forward overall
#1427
Forward born in 1993
#684
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Pichler
Castleton · 2009-10
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Jones
Amherst · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kegan Couture
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.