IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Goeree Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 33 6 3 9 0.273 0.0668 0.0676 0.1878 0.1900
2016-17 Burlington Cougars OJHL 53 8 12 20 0.377 0.0925 0.0894 0.2598 0.2512
2017-18 — OJHL 43 9 18 27 0.628 0.1539 0.1414 0.4323 0.3972
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38650
Forward overall
#1865
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Derton
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Puddifant
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Keck
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.