← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Elger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 USNTDP Juniors USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 42 4 11 15 0.357 0.1991 0.2235 0.5250 0.5911
2022-23 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 52 18 29 47 0.904 0.3367 0.3554 1.3169 1.3900
2023-24 Omaha Lancers USHL 62 16 17 33 0.532 0.3272 0.3218 1.5683 1.5426
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 36 9 13 22 0.611
2024-25 Providence D1 HockeyEast 36 8 10 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2024-25 · Providence
+74.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15554
Forward overall
#758
Forward born in 2004
#1557
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2018-19
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.