IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Miles Gendron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-28 Country: Canada
2014 · Round 3, Pick #70  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Penticton Vees BCHL 54 5 12 17 0.315 0.1213 0.1257 0.4581 0.4749
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 30 3 4 7 0.233
2017-18 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 33 1 8 9 0.273
2016-17 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 36 4 7 11 0.306
2015-16 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 27 2 4 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2015-16 · UConn
+87.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14610
Defenseman overall
#1937
Defenseman born in 1996
#2460
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Buonopane
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Ciampichini
Elmira · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.