IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Harpur Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 56 2 13 15 0.268 0.1032 0.1081 0.3896 0.4080
2015-16 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 58 3 17 20 0.345 0.1329 0.1320 0.5015 0.4983
2016-17 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 54 7 32 39 0.722 0.2783 0.2623 1.0504 0.9900
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Niagara D1 AHA GR 35 3 14 17 0.486
2020-21 Niagara D1 AHA SR 15 0 8 8 0.533
2019-20 Niagara D1 AHA JR 34 4 8 12 0.353
2018-19 Niagara D1 AHA SO 41 2 11 13 0.317
2017-18 Niagara D1 AHA FR 36 1 7 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2017-18 · Niagara
+12.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7874
Defenseman overall
#1308
Defenseman born in 1996
#1752
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

George Kolovos
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Campion
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.