IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Damian Chrcek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 54 1 10 11 0.204 0.0785 0.0800 0.2964 0.3019
2015-16 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 53 5 16 21 0.396 0.1527 0.1474 0.5766 0.5564
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 11 1 0 1 0.091
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2016-17 · Michigan State
+64.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14499
Defenseman overall
#1924
Defenseman born in 1996
#2441
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Scarpino
Hobart · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Ross
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wagner
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.