IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dana Wallace Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Austin Bruins NAHL 43 8 12 20 0.465 0.1843 0.1968 — —
2022-23 Austin Bruins NAHL 56 14 17 31 0.554 0.2193 0.2234 0.5812 0.5921
2023-24 Austin Bruins NAHL 59 21 23 44 0.746 0.2955 0.2869 0.7830 0.7602
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21666
Forward overall
#1134
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack O'Hanisain
Adrian · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cayden Cahill
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Dekumbis
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.