IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Desharnais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-29 Country: Canada
2016 · Round 7, Pick #183  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — BCHL 54 1 4 5 0.093 0.0357 0.0369 0.1348 0.1392
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 42 5 8 13 0.309
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 38 0 11 11 0.289
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 32 2 1 3 0.094
2015-16 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2015-16 · Providence
+202.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28968
Defenseman overall
#3038
Defenseman born in 1996
#3427
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Carpenter
Colby · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Erb
Concordia · 2012-13
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Cramer
Albertus Magnus · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.