IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Cramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 34 11 11 22 0.647 0.0742 0.0786 0.1459 0.1545
2016-17 — EHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 New England Wolves EHL 20 1 1 2 0.100 0.0231 0.0232 0.0489 0.0490
2018-19 — EHL 37 1 6 7 0.189 0.0437 0.0416 0.0926 0.0882
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC GR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC SO 9 0 2 2 0.222
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC SR 9 0 2 2 0.222
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D1 UCHC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Neumann D1 MAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Neumann D3 MAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24910
Defenseman overall
#3155
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Madej
Adrian · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Schader
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.087 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Angel Montanez
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.