IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Madej Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 22 5 3 8 0.364 0.1292 0.1274 0.3817 0.3765
2015-16 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 45 10 8 18 0.400 0.1421 0.1339 0.4200 0.3956
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 17 0 3 3 0.176
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 26 1 2 3 0.115
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 18 2 2 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Adrian
+79.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10364
Defenseman overall
#1485
Defenseman born in 1995
#3631
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Dunn
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Derton
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Falanga
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.