← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen West Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 54 6 18 24 0.444 0.1761 0.1932 0.4666 0.5119
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 56 6 11 17 0.304 0.1866 0.1874 0.8945 0.8984
2023-24 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 58 7 12 19 0.328 0.2014 0.1923 0.9652 0.9215
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan D1 BigTen 33 4 9 13 0.394
2025-26 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 33 4 9 13 0.394
2024-25 Michigan D1 BigTen 34 0 3 3 0.088
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2024-25 · Michigan
-50.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7229
Defenseman overall
#1749
Defenseman born in 2004
#2817
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.