IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Dunleavy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Brockville Braves CCHL 43 11 15 26 0.605 0.1312 0.1282 0.4632 0.4527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 23 9 3 12 0.522
2018-19 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 19 2 3 5 0.263
2017-18 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 22 6 3 9 0.409
2016-17 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 24 11 4 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · Bowdoin
+469.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29890
Forward overall
#1249
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Devine
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Kuzyk
Adrian · 2005-06
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Meyer
Hamline · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.