IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devon Mussio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Surrey Eagles BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Coquitlam Express BCHL 55 0 7 7 0.127 0.0490 0.0523 0.1851 0.1974
2017-18 Coquitlam Express BCHL 56 1 11 12 0.214 0.0826 0.0841 0.3117 0.3175
2018-19 — BCHL 49 2 20 22 0.449 0.1730 0.1669 0.6530 0.6299
2019-20 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 54 2 34 36 0.667 0.2569 0.2569 0.9696 0.9696
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 27 3 15 18 0.667
2021-22 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 28 2 12 14 0.500
2020-21 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7988
Defenseman overall
#1678
Defenseman born in 1999
#1770
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Everson
Utica · 2015-16
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2017-18
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2014-15
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.