IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niko Karamanis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Vernon Vipers BCHL 57 17 12 29 0.509 0.1960 0.2027 0.7414 0.7666
2017-18 Vernon Vipers BCHL 55 12 12 24 0.436 0.1681 0.1657 0.6359 0.6270
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Williams D3 NESCAC — 23 4 11 15 0.652
2019-20 Williams D1 — SO 26 12 8 20 0.769
2019-20 Williams D3 NESCAC — 26 12 8 20 0.769
2018-19 Williams D1 — FR 20 4 11 15 0.750
2018-19 Williams D3 NESCAC — 20 4 11 15 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2018-19 · Williams
+385.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32402
Forward overall
#1620
Forward born in 1998
#1825
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence Cornellier
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.