IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 57 7 12 19 0.333 0.1284 0.1231 0.4848 0.4647
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 19 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 15 2 0 2 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2017-18 · Colgate
+26.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42326
Forward overall
#2073
Forward born in 1997
#2451
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nikolai Tishkevich
Neumann · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
J.J. Fecteau
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Artem Kondrashov
Lebanon Valley · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.