IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Powell Connor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 49 3 13 16 0.327 0.1258 0.1414 0.4752 0.5343
2017-18 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 51 2 19 21 0.412 0.1587 0.1708 0.5993 0.6450
2018-19 — BCHL 47 2 9 11 0.234 0.0902 0.0922 0.3405 0.3481
2019-20 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 54 6 21 27 0.500 0.1926 0.1926 0.7277 0.7277
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA — 35 1 6 7 0.200
2022-23 Michigan State D1 BigTen — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2021-22 Michigan State D1 BigTen — 28 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11081
Defenseman overall
#1989
Defenseman born in 2000
#2110
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grennan
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach VanCompernolle
Trine · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Nitkin
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.