IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Grennan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 23 7 13 20 0.870 0.0648 0.0635 0.1992 0.1953
2018-19 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 43 8 14 22 0.512 0.0577 0.0565 0.1740 0.1703
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 23 4 3 7 0.304 0.0703 0.0703 0.2461 0.2461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SR 12 1 0 1 0.083
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 — JR 13 1 0 1 0.077
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20255
Forward overall
#999
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole O'Connell
Concordia · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Doiron
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Felhaber
Hamilton · 2015-16
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.