← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Grennan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 23 7 13 20 0.870 0.0803 0.0787 0.1991 0.1952
2018-19 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 43 8 14 22 0.512 0.0669 0.0655 0.1736 0.1699
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 23 4 3 7 0.304 0.1241 0.1241 0.2446 0.2446
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 12 1 0 1 0.083
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 13 1 0 1 0.077
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19975
Forward overall
#985
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.