← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole O'Connell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Moorhead High USHS-MN 16 0 2 2 0.125 0.0154 0.0163 0.0303 0.0321
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 44 5 10 15 0.341 0.1211 0.1201 0.3596 0.3565
2019-20 Minot Minotauros NAHL 49 13 19 32 0.653 0.2320 0.2320 0.6889 0.6889
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 7 11 18 0.720
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 26 7 13 20 0.769
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 10 13 23 0.885
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 Concordia (MN) D1 FR 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · Concordia
+642.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33599
Forward overall
#1809
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2004-05
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.