IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reid Yochim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Langley Rivermen BCHL 42 0 9 9 0.214 0.0826 0.0851 0.3119 0.3215
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Princeton D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 22 2 2 4 0.182
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 31 0 2 2 0.065
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 31 4 10 14 0.452
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2017-18 · Princeton
+462.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20471
Defenseman overall
#2824
Defenseman born in 1998
#2892
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Posner
Bethel · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathaniel Bannister
Adrian · 2022-23
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Ihrie
St. Olaf · 2000-01
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.