← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Leyh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0745 0.0878 0.2914 0.3436
2017-18 Langley Rivermen BCHL 53 10 21 31 0.585 0.2179 0.2464 0.8523 0.9639
2018-19 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 15 27 42 0.824 0.3068 0.3304 1.1999 1.2923
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA GR 37 17 25 42 1.135
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA SR 35 13 16 29 0.829
2022-23 Bentley D1 AHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 31 3 7 10 0.323
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 34 7 3 10 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2019-20 · Quinnipiac
+15.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18741
Forward overall
#868
Forward born in 2001
#973
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2004-05
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.