← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Leyh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0909 0.2911 0.3432
2017-18 Langley Rivermen BCHL 53 10 21 31 0.585 0.2254 0.2549 0.8512 0.9626
2018-19 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 15 27 42 0.824 0.3173 0.3417 1.1984 1.2906
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA GR 37 17 25 42 1.135
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA SR 35 13 16 29 0.829
2022-23 Bentley D1 AHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 31 3 7 10 0.323
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 34 7 3 10 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2019-20 · Quinnipiac
+11.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19098
Forward overall
#906
Forward born in 2001
#887
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2004-05
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.