← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1019 0.1019 0.2009 0.2009
2020-21 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 38 19 28 47 1.237 0.2857 0.2857 0.6052 0.6052
2021-22 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 58 12 15 27 0.466 0.2746 0.2577 1.3981 1.3119
2022-23 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 46 8 13 21 0.457 0.2693 0.2387 1.3711 1.2153
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast GR 36 2 2 4 0.111
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 36 1 3 4 0.111
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 31 0 1 1 0.032
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2023-24 · Northeastern
-84.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14624
Forward overall
#737
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2023-24
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.