← New Search ↗ Social Card

P.J. Marrocco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 4 1 4 5 1.250 0.4192 0.4540 1.1567 1.2529
2015-16 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 31 3 5 8 0.258 0.0866 0.0898 0.2388 0.2475
2016-17 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 59 28 19 47 0.797 0.2672 0.2640 0.7372 0.7283
2017-18 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 28 22 19 41 1.464 0.4911 0.4575 1.3551 1.2624
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA 32 7 4 11 0.344
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC 24 1 4 5 0.208
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC 35 13 8 21 0.600
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC 35 7 7 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2018-19 · Arizona State
+22.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11952
Forward overall
#538
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2017-18
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.