← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson Schandor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 50 10 12 22 0.440 0.1695 0.1859 0.6411 0.7030
2018-19 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 41 15 16 31 0.756 0.2913 0.3037 1.1017 1.1487
2019-20 Surrey Eagles BCHL 56 25 36 61 1.089 0.4197 0.4197 1.5872 1.5872
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UConn D1 HockeyEast GR 37 10 31 41 1.108
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 34 5 16 21 0.618
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 35 11 21 32 0.914
2021-22 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 28 5 13 18 0.643
2020-21 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 22 6 8 14 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2020-21 · UConn
+189.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14635
Forward overall
#618
Forward born in 2000
#574
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2001-02
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2019-20
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.