| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Georgetown Raiders | OJHL | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.500 | 0.3677 | 0.3934 | 1.0328 | 1.1051 |
| 2017-18 | Chilliwack Chiefs | BCHL | 57 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.368 | 0.1419 | 0.1469 | 0.5361 | 0.5551 |
| 2018-19 | — | BCHL | 54 | 20 | 39 | 59 | 1.093 | 0.4210 | 0.4132 | 1.5901 | 1.5608 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 35 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.486 |
| 2022-23 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | SR | 42 | 17 | 18 | 35 | 0.833 |
| 2021-22 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | JR | 32 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.438 |
| 2020-21 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | SO | 15 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.600 |
| 2019-20 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | FR | 34 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.206 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.