← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Miotto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 2 2 1 3 1.500 0.3677 0.3934 1.0328 1.1051
2017-18 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 57 9 12 21 0.368 0.1419 0.1469 0.5361 0.5551
2018-19 BCHL 54 20 39 59 1.093 0.4210 0.4132 1.5901 1.5608
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast 35 9 8 17 0.486
2022-23 Canisius D1 AHA SR 42 17 18 35 0.833
2021-22 Canisius D1 AHA JR 32 7 7 14 0.438
2020-21 Canisius D1 AHA SO 15 2 7 9 0.600
2019-20 Canisius D1 AHA FR 34 5 2 7 0.206
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2019-20 · Canisius
-21.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16495
Forward overall
#780
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.