← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lukas Sillinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 7 13 20 0.357 0.1330 0.1456 0.5203 0.5695
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 34 14 11 25 0.735 0.2739 0.2850 1.0714 1.1149
2019-20 Penticton Vees BCHL 56 22 37 59 1.054 0.3925 0.3925 1.5352 1.5352
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Arizona State D1 NCHC 35 8 30 38 1.086
2023-24 Arizona State D1 NCHC 38 11 37 48 1.263
2022-23 Arizona State D1 NCHC 33 9 12 21 0.636
2021-22 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 37 17 21 38 1.027
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 28 6 9 15 0.536
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2020-21 · Bemidji State
+173.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16106
Forward overall
#683
Forward born in 2000
#736
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2012-13
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.