| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 56 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.357 | 0.1330 | 0.1456 | 0.5203 | 0.5695 |
| 2018-19 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 34 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 0.735 | 0.2739 | 0.2850 | 1.0714 | 1.1149 |
| 2019-20 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 56 | 22 | 37 | 59 | 1.054 | 0.3925 | 0.3925 | 1.5352 | 1.5352 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | — | 35 | 8 | 30 | 38 | 1.086 |
| 2023-24 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | — | 38 | 11 | 37 | 48 | 1.263 |
| 2022-23 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | — | 33 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.636 |
| 2021-22 | Bemidji State | D1 | CCHA | SO | 37 | 17 | 21 | 38 | 1.027 |
| 2020-21 | Bemidji State | D1 | WCHA | FR | 28 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.536 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.