IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Regan Kimens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — BCHL 54 10 9 19 0.352 0.1356 0.1385 0.5118 0.5226
2018-19 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 20 35 55 1.018 0.3924 0.3795 1.4813 1.4327
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 10 2 1 3 0.300
2020-21 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 16 3 3 6 0.375
2019-20 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 33 6 8 14 0.424
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2019-20 · Merrimack
+75.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18641
Forward overall
#912
Forward born in 1999
#853
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Bellant
Adrian · 2016-17
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Schneider
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.