IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bennett Norlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 40 5 6 11 0.275 0.1060 0.1060 0.4002 0.4003
2018-19 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 58 22 12 34 0.586 0.2259 0.2138 0.8531 0.8072
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Air Force D1 AHA SR 36 3 5 8 0.222
2021-22 Air Force D1 AHA JR 36 1 6 7 0.194
2020-21 Air Force D1 AHA SO 13 0 5 5 0.385
2019-20 Air Force D1 AHA FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2019-20 · Air Force
-2.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33266
Forward overall
#1664
Forward born in 1998
#1865
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Pickering
Concordia · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Tyson
Hobart · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Arrigoni
Hamline · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.