← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0551 0.0636 0.2080 0.2400
2018-19 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 48 10 11 21 0.438 0.1686 0.1855 0.6367 0.7004
2019-20 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 55 19 34 53 0.964 0.3713 0.3713 1.4023 1.4023
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 20 14 15 29 1.450 0.5587 0.5587 2.1102 2.1102
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 29 46 75 1.442 0.5557 0.5276 2.0990 1.9927
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC SR 34 8 14 22 0.647
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen GR 32 7 6 13 0.406
2023-24 Minnesota D1 BigTen SR 36 7 12 19 0.528
2022-23 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 21 1 6 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Minnesota
-0.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5843
Forward overall
#233
Forward born in 2001
#53
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.