IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Mistler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 42 2 9 11 0.262 0.0295 0.0290 0.0889 0.0873
2019-20 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 44 18 36 54 1.227 0.1384 0.1384 0.4167 0.4167
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Neumann D3 MAC SR 22 6 10 16 0.727
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 9 8 17 0.680
2021-22 Neumann D3 MAC SO 25 8 12 20 0.800
2020-21 Neumann D1 MAC FR 9 0 3 3 0.333
2020-21 Neumann D3 MAC FR 9 0 3 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2020-21 · Neumann
+1244.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18613
Forward overall
#903
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nathan Taurence
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Panchenko
St. Thomas · 2004-05
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark McKamey
Wentworth · 2007-08
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.