← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Wozney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Powell River Kings BCHL 27 0 7 7 0.259 0.0999 0.1077 0.3774 0.4069
2019-20 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 4 22 26 0.448 0.1727 0.1727 0.6524 0.6524
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 20 4 9 13 0.650 0.2504 0.2504 0.9459 0.9459
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SR 36 1 5 6 0.167
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 22 2 7 9 0.409
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 36 2 13 15 0.417
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 36 0 4 4 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2021-22 · Bowling Green
+9.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7788
Defenseman overall
#1638
Defenseman born in 2001
#1704
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2006-07
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2012-13
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.