← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kalen Szeto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Langley Rivermen BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 12 9 21 0.412 0.1587 0.1816 0.5993 0.6858
2019-20 Langley Rivermen BCHL 56 10 24 34 0.607 0.2339 0.2339 0.8835 0.8835
2020-21 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 17 7 8 15 0.882 0.3400 0.3400 1.2842 1.2842
2021-22 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 48 23 22 45 0.938 0.3612 0.3589 1.3643 1.3557
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC SR 31 3 2 5 0.161
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC JR 27 4 1 5 0.185
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC SO 27 2 2 4 0.148
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2022-23 · Yale
-35.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14791
Forward overall
#748
Forward born in 2002
#565
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2013-14
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2003-04
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2011-12
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.