← New Search ↗ Social Card

Axel Kumlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-23 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Frölunda HC · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0237 0.0257 0.0744 0.0808
2019-20 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 36 5 9 14 0.389 0.1524 0.1524 0.4777 0.4777
2020-21 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 19 7 3 10 0.526 0.2062 0.2062 0.6465 0.6465
2021-22 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 5 17 22 0.379 0.2332 0.2199 1.1175 1.0537
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 37 3 14 17 0.460
2024-25 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 38 6 15 21 0.553
2023-24 Miami D1 NCHC 34 2 9 11 0.324
2022-23 Miami D1 NCHC 32 3 8 11 0.344
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2022-23 · Miami
+156.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4535
Defenseman overall
#1189
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.