← New Search ↗ Social Card

Axel Kumlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-23 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Frölunda HC · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0239 0.0260 0.0823 0.0894
2019-20 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 36 5 9 14 0.389 0.1535 0.1535 0.5282 0.5282
2020-21 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 19 7 3 10 0.526 0.2077 0.2077 0.7148 0.7148
2021-22 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 5 17 22 0.379 0.2237 0.2109 1.1392 1.0741
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 37 3 14 17 0.460
2024-25 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 38 6 15 21 0.553
2023-24 Miami D1 NCHC 34 2 9 11 0.324
2022-23 Miami D1 NCHC 32 3 8 11 0.344
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2022-23 · Miami
+165.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4712
Defenseman overall
#1185
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2005-06
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.