← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Schoenfeld Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 5 1 2 3 0.600 0.2312 0.2561 0.8743 0.9685
2019-20 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 51 2 8 10 0.196 0.0658 0.0658 0.1817 0.1817
2020-21 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 9 0 3 3 0.333 0.1118 0.1118 0.3089 0.3089
2021-22 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 54 5 12 17 0.315 0.1056 0.1011 0.2918 0.2792
2022-23 Powell River Kings BCHL 36 3 7 10 0.278 0.1070 0.0972 0.4048 0.3676
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 7 0 2 2 0.286
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 10 0 1 1 0.100
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 22 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17804
Defenseman overall
#3075
Defenseman born in 2002
#2720
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.