icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Janesville Jets | NAHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Janesville Jets | NAHL | 41 | 6 | 19 | 25 | 0.610 | 0.2264 | 0.2264 | 1.8726 | 1.8726 |
| 2021-22 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 58 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 0.345 | 0.2196 | 0.2128 | 1.0333 | 1.0011 |
| 2022-23 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 27 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.407 | 0.2594 | 0.2378 | 1.2209 | 1.1194 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Stonehill | D1 | — | — | 35 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 0.629 |
| 2024-25 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | — | 22 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.364 |
| 2024-25 | Northern Michigan | D1 | CCHA | — | 23 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.348 |
| 2023-24 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | — | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.