← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Upson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Vernon Vipers BCHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0414 0.0442 0.1619 0.1727
2019-20 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 3 9 12 0.222 0.0828 0.0828 0.3238 0.3238
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 20 6 15 21 1.050 0.3911 0.3911 1.5300 1.5300
2021-22 Langley Rivermen BCHL 46 18 26 44 0.957 0.3563 0.3263 1.3937 1.2764
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA SR 40 2 12 14 0.350
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA JR 33 1 12 13 0.394
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA SO 27 6 6 12 0.444
2022-23 Bentley D1 AHA FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Bentley
-21.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15185
Forward overall
#689
Forward born in 2001
#664
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2018-19
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.