← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Milburn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 25 6 2 8 0.320 0.1233 0.1233 0.4663 0.4663
2020-21 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 20 1 10 11 0.550 0.2119 0.2119 0.8014 0.8014
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 36 9 14 23 0.639 0.2462 0.2261 0.9309 0.8551
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 34 6 13 19 0.559
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 28 9 14 23 0.821
2023-24 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 34 16 19 35 1.029
2022-23 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA FR 34 3 2 5 0.147
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Lake Superior State
-24.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28026
Forward overall
#1456
Forward born in 2001
#1538
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.