IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Seaman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Exeter NE-Prep 31 14 8 22 0.710 0.1406 0.1406 0.3233 0.3233
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 56 3 13 16 0.286 0.1101 0.1101 0.4158 0.4158
2020-21 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 17 10 6 16 0.941 0.3626 0.3626 1.3697 1.3697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Middlebury D3 NESCAC — 26 2 6 8 0.308
2023-24 Middlebury D3 NESCAC — 26 2 7 9 0.346
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Union D1 ECAC — 23 3 2 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2021-22 · Union
+80.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22764
Forward overall
#1063
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Bandazian
Skidmore · 2005-06
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Hall
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Salmon
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.