IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Sweeney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 29 4 10 14 0.483 0.0956 0.0956 0.2200 0.2200
2019-20 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 58 2 12 14 0.241 0.0930 0.0930 0.3513 0.3513
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 26 1 11 12 0.462 0.1882 0.1882 0.3710 0.3710
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 35 2 6 8 0.229
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 32 0 4 4 0.125
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 34 0 3 3 0.088
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast — 22 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30199
Forward overall
#1506
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

William Winship
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Zuccaro
Westfield State · 2008-09
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Toivo Kramer
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.